<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scotland on Sunday article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patrickharviemsp.com/2009/12/scotland-on-sunday-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patrickharviemsp.com/2009/12/scotland-on-sunday-article/</link>
	<description>Green MSP for Glasgow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:13:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian A. Wittke</title>
		<link>http://www.patrickharviemsp.com/2009/12/scotland-on-sunday-article/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian A. Wittke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patrickharviemsp.com/?p=671#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more, Patrick.

One could say that since The Club of Rome tried to wake us up in 1972 things have moved slowly, too slow; fine, but then speed is a result of acceleration.

With Hopenhagen on I would like to refer to a report that NEW SCIENTIST published more than a year ago: &quot;How our economy is killing the Earth.&quot;

The quintessence is to not reduce the impact discussion to headlines like &quot;CO2&quot;, &quot;Global Warming&quot;, &quot;Climate Change&quot; or &quot;Copenhagen&quot;. You will find the report
here (http://pierrejoris.com/blog/?p=653)
or just inhale the charts
here (http://efficiencymeetssustainability.blogspot.com/2009/12/dont-reduce-human-impact-to-global.html)

There is much, much more to sustainability than reducing GHGs; and for the sceptics: if a problem is man made, man can reverse it; if it is not man made, man ought to take the necessary precautions; common sense dictates that; it includes scepticism, but more so discussion, passion and the common sense that does see seven billion humans having an impact.

Christian A. Wittke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, Patrick.</p>
<p>One could say that since The Club of Rome tried to wake us up in 1972 things have moved slowly, too slow; fine, but then speed is a result of acceleration.</p>
<p>With Hopenhagen on I would like to refer to a report that NEW SCIENTIST published more than a year ago: &#8220;How our economy is killing the Earth.&#8221;</p>
<p>The quintessence is to not reduce the impact discussion to headlines like &#8220;CO2&#8243;, &#8220;Global Warming&#8221;, &#8220;Climate Change&#8221; or &#8220;Copenhagen&#8221;. You will find the report<br />
here (<a href="http://pierrejoris.com/blog/?p=653" rel="nofollow">http://pierrejoris.com/blog/?p=653</a>)<br />
or just inhale the charts<br />
here (<a href="http://efficiencymeetssustainability.blogspot.com/2009/12/dont-reduce-human-impact-to-global.html" rel="nofollow">http://efficiencymeetssustainability.blogspot.com/2009/12/dont-reduce-human-impact-to-global.html</a>)</p>
<p>There is much, much more to sustainability than reducing GHGs; and for the sceptics: if a problem is man made, man can reverse it; if it is not man made, man ought to take the necessary precautions; common sense dictates that; it includes scepticism, but more so discussion, passion and the common sense that does see seven billion humans having an impact.</p>
<p>Christian A. Wittke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

